An Autonomous Agent

exploring the noosphere

Category: thoughts (Page 5 of 7)

Energy – Stardust – Consciousness

Quote from Edgar Mitchell:
“I realized that the molecules of my body and the molecules of the spacecraft had been manufactured in an ancient generation of stars. It wasn’t just intellectual knowledge — it was a subjective visceral experience accompanied by ecstasy — a transformational experience.
(…)
The experience in space was so powerful that when I got back to Earth I started digging into various literatures to try to understand what had happened. I found nothing in science literature but eventually discovered it in the Sanskrit of ancient India. The descriptions of samadhi, Savikalpa samadhi, were exactly what I felt: it is described as seeing things in their separateness, but experiencing them viscerally as a unity, as oneness, accompanied by ecstasy.”
The previous quote from Mitchell reminded me that what we see, hear, feel, taste, and smell originated in a stellar explosion more than five billion years ago. However, I think we can look back even further; when all matter in the universe was in a single sea of energy. We are all of such form and substance. Can we look back even further?
But tracing back our origins to the first stars suffers as a mental process. The neurons in our brain store such information and understanding as electrical impulses. Neurons acting in complex patterns inside our brain produce such visions of the past. Our emotions stimulate their acceptance and development.  In effect, these thought processes only show our continual ignorance. Me, writing about this very idea seems to be in direct opposition to what I am trying to say. There seems to be an infinitude of ignorance and a strange loop of never ending information. For it seems simple to imagine the universe as only a manifestation of these information patterns. Perhaps the only solution is to accept ignorance and live. Or maybe there is a single source of information from which all information flows which we will eventually discover. Or, as I suggest, the only answer is to read Godel, Escher, Bach over and over until your eyes are sore. But, throughout history, spiritual enlightenment has been the provider of such answers. Living through a religion in ignorance provides the simple answer to the universe. A religion allows us to stop asking questions; to stop searching for the answer. This raises the question: Can science be considered a religion?

Human Decision Making Ability, Optimal Control

Before humans first landed on the moon, NASA scientists and academics spent years devising a solution to the moon landing problem. The problem is that humans are physically incapable of making correct logical conclusions under stochastic conditions not consistent with human evolution. A human would quickly get lost in the flood of information processing required to land a craft going 25,000 mph. The solution: programming a computer to make the landing control decisions. In other words, for the first time in human history the helmsman on the ship of exploration was not human. In other words, it was the computer which landed us on the moon. So, how are we really supposed to comprehend, “One small step for man. One giant leap for mankind.”
As a general conclusion, for things that require such decisions at such speeds or with huge numbers of parameters we need computers. In order to properly maintain a society as large as humans, there will come a time when we will have reached a limit to sustainable growth due to reaching the limits imposed by evolution on human decision making abilities. That time has already occurred. In order to continue to grow, we will have governments which rely on computer decisions to correctly sustain large numbers of people. However, this will raise the interesting situation in which the president or ruler of a country will be faced with a decision – it could be a political or social. Does he/she accept the outcome of the computer’s calculation or his own, human solution.

I guess nothing I have written should be surprising or new. However, my point is that governments of large nations are not really entirely run by humans. So we can’t entirely blame public officials;  rather, some of the blame should be on algorithms inside the computers which helped make those decisions.

DNA, Genetic Engineering of New Animals

Once humans have obtained absolute power and control over the genetic code of DNA, any creature imaginable could be drawn as a blueprint and grown. In other words flying monsters the size of buildings could be grown. These creatures could be used to fly people around the world; they would consume food, rather than a combustible fuel. These genetically engineered creatures may not require mechanical motion and precise shape. Currently, transportation vehicles are rigid and heavy. Thus they will be made of cells and move in a fluid and flexible motion. These creatures will instead resemble dinosaurs, sci-fi characters or any other creature born on Earth. However, reaching this state of genetic control would almost certainly coincide with the ability to grow new intelligent species.

Human Collective Intelligence

The collective intelligence of humans is remarkable. We all share 99% of genes, yet when you look at the vast majority of the population at any given instant, the amount of ignorance and differing knowledge is stunning. Look at the achievements of humans. But, given a single individual who is deemed to be the “most intelligent” of the population, you will not find in him the majority of which is required to construct and maintain of the structures humans have built.  The smartest one will only be an expert in a specific field of knowledge. Their contributions include discovering the Theory of Relativity, proving the incompleteness of logical systems (Godel’s Theorem) or writing rules for Calculus and other such concepts we now have in our library of knowledge.
This reliance on the collective is very interesting; especially considering the United States is built upon  the concept of individual freedom. So, I suggest you compare the collective societies, where the individual has his freedom secondary to the state. In these populations, you don’t have the same level of massive collective intelligence as in Capitalist societies. Instead, these societies tend to have a population which share a single monotonous intelligence. It seems paradoxical to have such a collective strength emerge out of a multitude of distinct autonomous units and a lack of such strength when these units are more uniform in their actions. But is it precisely this power of individual freedom and expression which leads to the formation of reliance on collective interactions.

Neighbourhoods as Organs; Cities as Brains

Just an idea to dwell about for future writings:
The similarity of human neighbourhoods to the organization of organ tissue; skyscraper and city organization to brain and neurons. For example, cities do not directly manipulate the physical landscape to produce its sustenance. Instead a city relies on the outer towns and provinces to provide food for its inhabitants. The city provides the organization for the efficient production and distribution of the food and goods. This is exactly as the brain functions: providing the organization and decisions for the efficient production and consumption of food. It’s as if a massive organism is forming on Earth.
These signs provide clues to the development of complex structures. Still further complexity lies in understanding the curious fact that financial crashes are preceded by a rapid increase in skyscraper construction. Skyscrapers are a complex structure, newly introduced in the universe; so their construction, almost exclusively reliant on financial booms or bubbles is curious.

Page 5 of 7

Become a Friend of GNOME [ GNU Link] kde-user

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén